nugnugx
Donator
 Posts: 4051
|
|
« on: July 29, 2011, 01:31:50 pm » |
|
What about a grenade that would stick to a soldier once it touches him ?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2011, 01:35:03 pm » |
|
how do you throw it then?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2011, 01:35:57 pm » |
|
how do you throw it then?
Very carefully. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
- Andre Malraux
- Dracula
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2011, 01:36:33 pm » |
|
non sticky part !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
 Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2011, 01:37:19 pm » |
|
Hand held? You don't. Not if you want a grenade capable of sticking to a target of equal adhesiveness to yourself.
Dip a rifle grenade in axle grease (Or any old adhesive substance that comes to hand) on the other hand...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2011, 01:39:03 pm » |
|
I doubt the technology was available to deploy a rifle grenade with an adhesive on it without the possible danger of it sticking to the barrel of the gun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2011, 01:39:58 pm » |
|
You'd only need to get the front half of it in the adhesive due to the nature of how a rifle grenade fires. It doesn't exactly flip like a boss mid-air.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2011, 01:45:48 pm » |
|
if you hit someone with rifle nade,why da fuck do you want it to stickie itself to him,when it will blew guy up upon the impact  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2011, 01:48:05 pm » |
|
if you hit someone with rifle nade,why da fuck do you want it to stickie itself to him,when it will blew guy up upon the impact stickie it to him and then blow him up ? cooler feature? lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2011, 01:48:29 pm » |
|
That, would depend on the rifle grenade in question.
Not all rifle grenades were contact detonation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2011, 01:48:47 pm » |
|
stickie it to him and then blow him up ? cooler feature? lol
like a boss |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2011, 01:56:35 pm » |
|
A sticky rifle grenade would surely be more effective against tanks and vehicles as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2011, 02:05:40 pm » |
|
cuz we all know that rifle nades are WIN against tanks |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2011, 02:06:30 pm » |
|
cuz we all know that rifle nades are WIN against tanks hey if relic put in Bren Button..... lol anything is possible |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 29, 2011, 02:09:59 pm » |
|
AP rounds for rifle grenade ? LOL
Then we need HE rocket for panzerschreck vs inf to balance things out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2011, 02:10:08 pm » |
|
cuz we all know that rifle nades are WIN against tanks As I recall the Brits actually had an AT rifle grenade in the war, wouldn't exactly be difficult to implement here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 29, 2011, 03:09:06 pm » |
|
yes,here it's called piat,lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 29, 2011, 03:39:15 pm » |
|
N* 74 ST was a 4 lb. sticky AT grenade issued to Commando troops post D-Day. It was debatable if it was as effetive as the Gammon bomb grenade, but was accepted (albiet with a bit of ire, many men tied trying to train with the grenade when they stuck it to themselves) by its users.
Being made for AT duty, it would resemble the PE AT grenade (IRL had about half the explosive radius of your average Pineapple grenade) and probably wouldnt do anything to infantry. If it did, it would be like the Recon Tommie shot; gibs one man and possibly hurts another, no more, no less.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
 Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 29, 2011, 03:40:29 pm » |
|
Trolololo realism
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 29, 2011, 03:42:19 pm » |
|
In short (ignoring Schmidt), no, bad idea. Would just be a PE AT nade copycat. Worthless vs infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
