*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2024, 06:37:52 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sherman upgun pen  (Read 4962 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« on: August 07, 2011, 07:14:24 am »

What is the current sherm upgun pen vs other tanks?

Seems really crazy, was penetrating my panther and tiger from front with like every shot.
Logged

LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2011, 07:26:36 am »

look it up yourself
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2011, 07:54:20 am »

Nug, you're a biased fanboy. Stop making threads that make no fucking sense.
Logged

nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2011, 07:56:49 am »

Nug, you're a biased fanboy. Stop making threads that make no fucking sense.


Nope i'm not a fanboy, that's a observation from ingame.
Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2011, 08:00:19 am »

i cba to go find the rule but its something like this:

Rule 5: dont get owned and come make a bs thread about it afterwards.
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2011, 08:05:24 am »

You are nug. Every single thing you ever fucking say comes from you "perceiving" something that's absolute bollocks in-game and then coming to cry about it here, endlessly pissing me off.

Stop doing it, go learn some fucking corsix and look up the stats yourself - then you can come and post your woes.
Logged
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2011, 08:45:45 am »

hes always talking about his fucking axis

tiger range

stroms mp44

penetration of tiger and panther from sherman

...
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2011, 09:50:13 am »

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=14995.0

Easy stuff. Why even ask? You've been in the community 1 month more than me and you still can't use corsix? Or are you just that lazy?
Don't expect others to do it if your too lazy to.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2011, 10:08:35 am »

The parts that are important.

Sherman Upgun will kill your P4 or STuG.

It will take some health off a Panther, it will take some health off a Tiger.

2 Shermans will cripple a Panther/Tiger when used correctly and you are not properly supporting your tank.

I think the Sherman Upgun should get it's reload penalty back TBH.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
lionel23 Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1854


« Reply #9 on: August 07, 2011, 10:13:15 am »

And why should you get an upgrade that nerfs the tank when it already has reduced efficiency vs Infantry?  That's like saying make Skirts on P4s give them more incoming accuracy since they are a bigger, slower target.
Logged

Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)

AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2011, 10:14:45 am »

That or raise the price. It's called balance. I mean, we could always reduce the cost of handheld AT across the board to make the skirts useful I suppose.
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #11 on: August 07, 2011, 10:18:40 am »

Quote
That's like saying make Skirts on P4s give them more incoming accuracy since they are a bigger, slower target.

how are they slower?
bigger from which point of view? if you are hitting it from side,where skirt is placed,it's as big as withouth skirt,and if you are hitting it from front to skirt,since it's now wider,if you hit skirt,you dont do any dmg to tank itself.
Logged
lionel23 Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1854


« Reply #12 on: August 07, 2011, 10:20:27 am »

Make bazookas semi-useful again and you'll see a lot more of that on the field.  The problem lies in the effectiveness and cost of allied handheld AT

Boys AT - Utter junk for their cost, only good against light vehicles
Bazookas - Without a doctrine buff, it's too weak to deal with tanks, even with flanking unless you got hoardes of them all flanking at once
RR - The American 'piat', great penetration and accuracy though crap vrs light vehicles like pumas due to no scatter.
Piats - The ultimate allied AT weapon, excellent accuracy vrs all vehicles/tanks/inf since the speed modifier got applied, I'd take an army of them if I could.

That being said, when said Axis guy rolls out a Tiger or higher... well, it's quite silly to throw super expensive rangers at him, Airborne have a decent chance to hurt it and run, and boys AT is well.. pissing on a bucket at that point.  And you don't even really need skirts for that.

I dunno, the Sherman is just right where it is, able to fight other axis mediums with upgun and has a chance to hurt a heavy tank, though has no where near the armor or HP as a tiger.  I have no issue throwing my tiger as two upgun shermans, they aren't 100% penetrating weapons and the tiger will dish out way more hurt than the shermans.  Now if they were both fireflies, that's a different issue.

@Smurf - Slower in terms of weight of the skirt on the tank.  Nerfing the effective of the only good, decent US tank would - to me - require a nerfing of axis medium armor to offset that.
Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #13 on: August 07, 2011, 10:50:33 am »

lionel, piat speed increase got reverted.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #14 on: August 07, 2011, 11:03:39 am »

And Axis medium armor is in a poor state already.

Logged
SaintPauli Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530


« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2011, 11:31:51 am »

What is the current sherm upgun pen vs other tanks?
Vs Tiger:
45% chance
60% chance and +10 dam with HVAP Rounds

Vs Panther:
20%
26% chance and +10 dam with HVAP Rounds

Don’t use the tiger alone vs. anything other than 75mm Shermans, Churchills, and Cromwells. Tigers simply cannot compete vs. the new tanks…
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2011, 11:35:12 am »

Quote
Boys AT - Utter junk for their cost, only good against light vehicles

except it's great against one ehole faction,PE!

Quote
RR - The American 'piat', great penetration and accuracy though crap vrs light vehicles like pumas due to no scatter.

so whats wrong if ther's a counter to them,ie. puma which is very rarely used?

Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2011, 11:36:26 am »

The Puma would be a counter, if it reliably killed anything.....
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2011, 11:38:57 am »

it's quite good against ab if they are not in cover,if they are,that's another story.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2011, 12:56:33 pm »

isnt poor axis medium armor just you know, the P4?
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 36 queries.