Smokaz

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Mister Schmidt]

You have a new job as a wine taster or something?

[Heartmann]

Smokaz and Job??!! Now there is an oxymoron if ever!

[nugnugx]

Smokaz is a fine consieur of le vin de derrière les femmes

[Smokaz]

*coq would have been good, i'd say you were touching on 90%

of a

P R E M I U M member

[Smokaz]

Smokaz and Job??!! Now there is an oxymoron if ever!

Actually Job was punished by God for asking what gave God the right to punish him. Woah, smoking!

Oxymoron? What you ended up writing is called a allegory. If you were looking for the meaning of job as in doing work and weren't a skateboarding looney-tunes ignoramus asking people to restart their computers when there's a problem, you'd not put j in a uppercase and destroy your own statement.

You can send the thank-you-note to charity, sign it

Premium Member

[nugnugx]

Job, is one of the books of the Hebrew Bible. It relates the story of Job, his trials at the hands of Satan, his discussions with friends on the origins and nature of his suffering, his challenge to God, and finally a response from God. The book is a didactic poem set in a prose frame. The over-riding and oft-asked question asked in the book of Job is,

"Why do the righteous suffer?"

[Smokaz]

[nugnugx]

Don't forget Steve that had a lot of Jobs.

[Heartmann]

Actually your wrong smokaz, its not an allegory, it is an oxymoron, in the sense, that the word means "a term which contradicts it self" meaning Smokaz and Job, are to contradictions, another is military intelligences, or Girlie man But i understand that a alcoholic north man, with the intellect of a wet sponge would have a hard time understanding this. ^^

[Smokaz]

If you'd advanced beyond a pubertal grasp of english you'd be familiar with the rule that we write uppercase on the beginning letter of a name which a 'job' is not even in the slightest. However 'Job' is a fictional character in the good old fairytale book that suffers great injustice at the hands of tale's supreme authority yet never poses the question of why he is slighted.

[8thRifleRegiment]

# of your dealer?

[Hicks58]

*Grabs popcorn, sits the fuck back and proceeds to watch this hilarity unfold.*

[Heartmann]

If you'd advanced beyond a pubertal grasp of English (btw, if u are now going to cite grammar) you'd be familiar with the rule that we write uppercase on the beginning letter of a name which a 'job' is not even in the slightest. However 'Job' is a fictional character in the good old fairytale book that suffers great injustice at the hands of tale's supreme authority yet never poses the question of why he is slighted.

Oh my you had nothing better to say, so you picked the most insignificant of things as a typo as your main attack point? Well I should not expect anything less from such a inbred defeated and overall conquered race that is the Norwegians, wait how many years where you subjugated to how many different nations?

This does not however change the first or secondary statement, so regardless of WHAT you think of my grammar. My point of case still stands, and you loose.

[Heartmann]

*Grabs popcorn, sits the fuck back and proceeds to watch this hilarity unfold.*

*Throws pie in face!*

[Smokaz]

Oh my you had nothing better to say, so you picked the most insignificant of things as a typo as your main attack point? Well I should not expect anything less from such a inbred defeated and overall conquered race that is the Norwegians, wait how many years where you subjugated to how many different nations?

This does not however change the first or secondary statement, so regardless of WHAT you think of my grammar. My point of case still stands, and you loose.

Nothing you've produced using your keyboard and your furry kobold hands so far change the fact that you screwed up your own verbal stab at me by making a comparison to Job as the name of a person and not having a lowercase 'job' as in working. It entertains the crowd that you see this as me correcting a grammaresque mistake when I merely pointed out how you ended up creating a sympathic comparison between me and the character of Job from the Bible when you originally intended to defame me based on baseless speculation.

[Heartmann]

Me defame you? I think you do that perfectly well by yourself.

And any simpleton would understand that I mean job, and not the character Job. But you are as ever the exemption that proves the rule

[Smokaz]

Stating that a person - and by the extent of a named person, his quallities - are oxymoron to the prospect of having a job -  can't objectively be seen as something else than a attempt at defaming. Not only does it present that I lack the qualities to have a job which in itself is bad, but since how having a job and aquiring money is central to the modern lifestyle it also suggests that I am lesser than the average person.

But you just keep doing a Black Swan ballet dance around your own words and let me just give you these small half-hearted pushes to make you fall down when you get dizzy.

I also laugh at your declaration that a simpleton would more easily spot errors or see connections of literature in other people's mistakes than the opposite type of person. Last time I checked, stupid persons weren't exactly the cliché definition of people being able to spot details.

[tank130]

[Heartmann]

Last time I checked, stupid persons weren't exactly the cliché definition of people being able to spot details.

And yet you do, so you are the exception that proves the rule


P.S.

You might want to change the stupid persons? to stupid people

[Smokaz]

By this point I feel like I've crippled you already, seeing as you regurgitate the grammar thing. I don't pick on cripples.
Next please!