Aug 15th, 2009

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Spartan_Marine88]

70/30 i think would be good, personally i think 60/25/15 25 att/def based on warmap like you said tank but 15 for the other (r+ and the other mode not on warmap) as even if your the aggressor you can be counter attacked and end up on the defensive.


Personally i think the higher the random chance the more you force people to make more balanced companies (while still being able to follow a theme) as you need to be a little more prepared for what might be

[Smokaz]

Maybe 75% warmap and 25% random

[tank130]

I think the random has to to be the higher percentage to keep the company build risks high enough as well as helping map selection be less of an issue.

I also feel the Warmap should have control of the game mods, not the players. Some may argue this limits your options, but lets be honest here. Att /Def has been broken for over a year and it has VERY little affect at all on the game. Even when it did work, 90% of the games were Engagement or Reinforcements.

So with that in mind, how about this?

Start of War:
100% Random

For each 10% the Warmap progresses the game mode changes by 10%

For example:

Warmap Progression = Allies 110% Axis 90%
Random 90%
Allies attack 10%
Axis attack 0%


Warmap Progression = Allies 120% Axis 80%
Random 80%
Allies attack 20%
Axis attack 0%


so on and so on.......


Warmap Progression = Allies 180% Axis 20% (insert Hitler raging video here)
Random 20%
Allies attack 80%
Axis attack 0%

[Tymathee]

that sounds like it involved a lot of scar coding.

[hans]

would be nonesense if not

[Spartan_Marine88]

Interesting idea tank. Especially if objective based maps were to ever make it back