aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« on: February 18, 2012, 03:20:11 am » |
|
why the fudge does this thing cost as much pool as a sherman and more then a staghound ffs. the t17 cant even penetrate rear armor HT. on another note what is a stuart tank good for? it doesnt seem very good ai compared to the staghound.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2012, 03:35:11 am » |
|
stuart is to be used against light vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2012, 03:46:01 am » |
|
stuart is to be used against light vehicles
so like PE?. it penetrates well enough it just misses infantry. so its a at tank i guess. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2012, 05:05:21 am » |
|
Yea t17 pool cost needs brought down to 9 in line with other light vehicles...12 is ridiculous. Noticed that earlier tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2012, 05:11:44 am » |
|
Stuart is a light tank
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
 Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2012, 08:35:05 am » |
|
Aeroblade, stop being missinformed... T17's rape infartry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2012, 08:45:46 am » |
|
He's not talking about the T17, he's talking about the Stuart against inf.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2012, 10:31:20 am » |
|
He's not talking about the T17, he's talking about the Stuart against inf.
hes talking about both. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2012, 10:33:51 am » |
|
i had no idea how high t17 pool cost was, thats ridiculous! also i never found a place for stuarts in my company, there's a player or two who use them to good effect (when spammed) ive seen a few times.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2012, 10:52:54 am » |
|
hes talking about both.
Epic fail. T17 is pure anti infantry LV. Problem is it tends to miss a bit. And yeah T17 pool is a little high, but its worth more than a stag or a stuart. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2012, 03:20:06 pm » |
|
yeah 12 is a bit high but at the same time they used to be spammed like crazy so they had to be upped. Pool imo is a better way to restrict usage than price.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2012, 03:47:18 pm » |
|
staghound RE is way better imo. for cheaper in everytime.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2012, 03:53:24 pm » |
|
You cannt include doctrine buffs in balance, becuase those are only possibilities. T17 is purly anti inf
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I will never forget the rage we enduced together  Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2012, 04:24:48 pm » |
|
okay even without doctrinal buffs i still think the staghound is way better for what you pay and in pool value.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2012, 04:55:19 pm » |
|
i agree there but the t-17 doesn't the same type of buffs either that the stag can get.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2012, 05:57:51 pm » |
|
thats true so even with buffs the staghound still is better and without it is better. the 120 fuel i could live with but the 12 pool is a bit much, i hardly actually see them around now that i think of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2012, 06:01:50 pm » |
|
Well that's your opinion. but You don't want T17's spammed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2012, 06:05:53 pm » |
|
thats true but i still can spam staghounds.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2012, 09:50:20 pm » |
|
You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? You clearly have not used Urban Survival T-17's or even normal ones if you think vanilla staghounds are so much better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2012, 12:14:01 am » |
|
You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? You clearly have not used Urban Survival T-17's or even normal ones if you think vanilla staghounds are so much better.
try not to treat me as a lower being kthxbye. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 19, 2012, 01:09:02 am by aeroblade56 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
