NightRain
|
|
« on: April 09, 2012, 01:32:58 pm » |
|
A basically a entrenched sandbag bunker for the US Infantry Doctrine. It starts with Engineers and costs 5 munitions 1 pop.  A British Vickers nest without the Vickers itself and can be garrisoned by riflemen so that they can fire out from the 4 directions. Also accessable for a machinegun team that can rotate within the room. Comments? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
 Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 01:34:35 pm » |
|
It would be cool but I don't think it's really necessary
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2012, 01:38:26 pm » |
|
how different would that be to trench?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2012, 01:51:28 pm » |
|
How about a open topped US ht instead? Didn't they have one in WW2?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2012, 01:52:42 pm » |
|
I like it. Infantry is kind of the defensive doctrine for US and this would really help this. how different would that be to trench?
it's more american than british :shrug: plus it looks cool. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2012, 02:07:21 pm » |
|
lol,how is sandbag bunker more american than british?
are ships more british than american?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tank130
Sugar Daddy
 Posts: 8889
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2012, 02:09:09 pm » |
|
lol,how is sandbag bunker more american than british?
are ships more british than american?
I would assume he is referencing the game, not real life. In that case, what looks like an emplacement would be more British. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2012, 02:17:33 pm » |
|
I would assume he is referencing the game, not real life. In that case, what looks like an emplacement would be more British.
it's the same model of the US HMG, w/o the hmg |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tank130
Sugar Daddy
Posts: 8889
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2012, 02:23:00 pm » |
|
it's the same model of the US HMG, w/o the hmg
Huh? The Us emplacement is not round, it is...... cross between a triagle and a square (whatever the fuck that is...lol) The British is round. This looks like a British emplacement with an American star on it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2012, 02:24:35 pm » |
|
A trapezoid Tank.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2012, 02:26:00 pm » |
|
You do know what a fox hole is right? Because it's a not a huge defensive emplacement like the vickers HMG nest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2012, 02:29:56 pm » |
|
Huh?
The Us emplacement is not round, it is...... cross between a triagle and a square (whatever the fuck that is...lol)
The British is round.
This looks like a British emplacement with an American star on it.
oh, meh :shrug: still want as a bottom unlock |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2012, 02:38:54 pm » |
|
A trapezoid Tank.
It's funny because he's an architect  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2012, 02:40:40 pm » |
|
He sure knows how to build up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2012, 02:44:43 pm » |
|
It has one thing. 5 mun price which means you can spend those 15 muns to 3 foxholes like you do with wehr. 5 muns extra to a bunker. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2012, 04:40:46 pm » |
|
Make a really small round trench, allow it to be garrisonable by one squad. (or quad)
foxhole completed.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 09, 2012, 04:51:23 pm by Spartan_Marine88 »
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2012, 04:46:58 pm » |
|
Personally, I'd find it fucking hilarious to see a Quad in a foxhole Spartan. :p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2012, 04:51:07 pm » |
|
fixed, thats what i get for typing to fast
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2012, 05:03:38 pm » |
|
i really like this suggestion, just not that model.
also should be nondoctrinal
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2012, 02:47:12 am » |
|
Lets go deeper to this suggestion. First its not a trench, giving them a trench wouldn't be a bad idea but would it be exactly a good one either? Therefore I thought of something inbetween a trench and Wehrmacht bunker. Then I created this idea. Foxhole. The original part of the idea came from C&C 3 Tiberium Wars.  So why the heck not. Then the fact that Both Allies have trouble spending all of their munitions. Lack of 5, 10, 15 mun spots to invest them. Sure, jeep repair 10 mun but that leaves 5 mun extra anyhow. Then the fact that US has no buildings. No trenches, no bunkers...so a mix of these two created the idea of a Foxhole. 5 mun investment, good cover for riflemen/hmg. 360 radius (HMG must redeploy to fire from another port hole, Riflemen/rangers/engineers don't) buildable by Engineers as a standard, through specializations even Riflemen can build one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
