*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2024, 08:36:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Eir needs more infantry  (Read 25315 times)
0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« on: June 30, 2012, 08:14:07 am »

We need more infantry in eir, every game now is mainly heavy tanks and medium tanks duking it out through whole game.
Panther/ tiger/ pershing starts are the norm.
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2012, 08:16:43 am »

no.
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2012, 08:17:15 am »

nug makes good post ?!!
Logged
tank130 Offline
Sugar Daddy
*
Posts: 8889


« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2012, 09:16:14 am »

God, it just pains me to see Nug post....... and he is right......

We kinda screwed the game with all the repairs and cheap vehicles. Tanks should be rare, not the core of a company.
Logged

Quote
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2012, 09:30:18 am »

God, it just pains me to see Nug post....... and he is right......

We kinda screwed the game with all the repairs and cheap vehicles. Tanks should be rare, not the core of a company.

Tanks are fine but they are all heavy class vehicles. Mediums are outright garbage.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2012, 09:47:19 am »

exactly. you made panthers cheaper and tigers and pershings buffier, what did you think would happen?
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Jodomar Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 734


« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2012, 09:50:32 am »

The grass is always greener on the other side.............
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2012, 09:53:03 am »

Well, it depends on what you guys want.

Heavies were meant to be the endgame vehicles from the warmap perspective right? Usually endgame stuff is supposed to be used alot more. And thier isn't really any endgame infantry other than flammer grens.


Now, come to realize, that we arnt actually in endgame yet Who is anywhere close to having a complete company? No one.

If you consider heavies to be endgame tanks where infantry dominates most of the war, then heavies were researched way too early in the war. Needs to have some sort of time period where you can't get t3 unlocks and so forth.


Now, if you take it from the perspective that endgame tanks shouldn't have such a presence on the field and that infantry should have a larger presence even in the last stages of the war, you can go ahead and lower overall fuel. Or if you want to focus on heavies as the issue you can increase the price slightly.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2012, 10:01:27 am »

We need more infantry in eir, every game now is mainly heavy tanks and medium tanks duking it out through whole game.
Panther/ tiger/ pershing starts are the norm.

cool, 4man kch at vet 3 parading around the field just owning everything was always fun playing vs.
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
skaffa Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 3130


The very best player of one of the four factions.

« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2012, 10:05:33 am »

Not more inf.

Just less tanks.
Logged

Quote from: deadbolt
bad luck skaffa>  creates best and most played eir maps
                      >  hated for creating best and most played eir maps

Quote from: Tachibana
47k new all time record?

Quote from: deadbolt
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2012, 10:28:27 am »

i got a 120 rifles with vet 2.  its not very cost effective.
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
Ahnungsloser Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1447



« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2012, 10:35:49 am »

exactly. you made panthers cheaper and tigers and pershings buffier, what did you think would happen?

That what you've seen in the last game.  Wink
Logged

9th Armoured Engineers
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2012, 10:42:31 am »

Infantry is boring, need more tanks.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2012, 10:47:20 am »

Take the BKmod approach. You can either tech up your company or purchase tank chassis to make armor available. Ergo, do I want the Infantry Bipods T2 or that shiny Hellcat chassis?
Logged

Quote from: tank130
I want to ensure we have a 100% decision on the process before we do the wipe.
If not, then I wipe, then someone gets something they shouldn't, then it gets abused, then the shit hits the fan and then I ban shab.

Getting EiR:R Released on Steam

Forum Rules & Guidelines
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2012, 10:52:24 am »

well in my opinion u have to be innovative in ur decisions what u call in. If i start with armour like a panther, or shermans, or m10s ..., its sometimes more effective and surprising than using inf. Inf is slow and not overwhelmingly strong...
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2012, 11:09:09 am »

Infantry is boring, need more tanks.

This x 1million
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2012, 11:09:51 am »

If your worried about heavy armour starts run a scouting start and have an alternative core to deal with it.

Same thing you'd do if you were genuinely wanting to take advantage of the chance of being on the defence. You make an alternative core focused on support weapons, engineers, etc.

Personally I rarely run heavy armour starts due to the high chance of them going pear-shaped. Most of the real hard AT and disablers get fielded earlier in the game with late game reliance leaning on handheld AT and ATG's (Or Marders) due to their ability to last.

Running right into an LATHT with treadbreaker loaded to go with your Pershing or Croc is a bitch. As is running on a rapidly placed Teller, or falling victim to a Volks slow mine, etc, etc... Rinse and reverse for Axis Panther/Tiger starts with appropriate Allied disabler counters.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2012, 11:15:09 am »

I agree with some other here, I used to like infartry more than tanks but... welll... Tank micro is simply more fun to play around with, and mediums dont suck, got all those vetted croms for a reason.
Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2012, 11:28:10 am »

Infantry is boring, need more tanks.

indeed, tanks need micro, inf needs blob


inb4 THEN USE MG PLOX

in response: sry 4 mando smoke/fireup/cloak

inb4 y u no flank 4,

sry4supression fire

inb4 y u no use smoke 4

.. u get where im going with this
Logged
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #19 on: June 30, 2012, 12:06:27 pm »

I don't like it when you make sense Deadbolt. It scares me.

Why cant you just put a silly picture and invoke the wrath of the mods resulting in lulz?

>.>
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 36 queries.