Them axis gimped by shitty Tigers though
I watched the replay, and I'm going to have to disagree.
I saw this comment before I watched it so I thought I'd keep an eye out.
You spent the better part of the game attempting to engage RR's with your Tiger (Generally bad idea 75% pen and the RR's spent most their time chilling in heavy cover, the rest of your company can deal with RR's/ATG's) as well as doing stuff like sitting in front of ATG's, thinking a 5% Tiger will take on an upgunned Sherman (Hi there 40-50% pen chance) and rolling your first Tiger into a mine then thinking it can still fight for a bit, lol.
Not only that, the amount of times I saw you trying to shoot infantry in heavy cover was cringe-worthy. Especially at long range. 54% chance to hit a target at long range, 50% less accuracy and 50% less incoming damage for the heavy cover. Bad times.
The Tiger gets a lot of bad rep but I'm wondering if it's the Tiger, or the users.
Though as much as I say that, Heartmann's Elephant took the biscuit for me. Why on earth would you rush it into 2 squads of RR's, an ATG to the face and a tank on the flank? o.O
Tiger criticism aside, the replay was pretty good.