Buffing Mand

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[XIIcorps]

They loose their invisibility after firing 5 shots if you tell them to attack something while camouflaged, so they don't do a lot of raping against KCH in the time between opening fire and uncloaking, at which point the KCH then rape them.

The only time I have ever destroyed Oak Leaf KCH with Sten Commandos was when my Sten Commandos were Vet3, had a Commando LT, had Red Devils, and were stationary in yellow cover while the KCH were moving in neutral cover, and even then the Commandos took a lot of damage (can't remember exactly how much or if any died tho)

Thats pretty much the results ive had.

I mean if you have to baby your mandos to vet 3 to even stand a chance vs kch, kinda says alot.

[Smokaz]

20 posts or so deleted. I tried to save some coherence, so give me a break.

[nikomas]

I just want to point this out by the way, I was wrong. The enfield is not one of the worst rifles after the carbine and volk rifle.

The Volk Kar98 is better than the Enfield now that I checked properly, meaning the only rifle in the game that is worse than the enfield iirc is the carbine... Yes, when you're close to the carbine in damage output you know you're fucked.

[aeroblade56]

Thank you everyone who has given correct or near correct information and has taken the time to provide us with such.

thank you smokaz for taking time to look through the thread and fix it.

i am a little sad to figure that carbines are only a bit worse :l no wonder why units fight like monkeys without officers.

[NightRain]

Here's the thing.

If you buff enfields Commandos carry, the officers would make them far greater and too good. Thus it is far harder to balance the rifle they carry.

[aeroblade56]

Here's the thing.

If you buff enfields Commandos carry, the officers would make them far greater and too good. Thus it is far harder to balance the rifle they carry.

arent officers receiving a nerf?.

in that case we should Buff the rifles instead of doing what we always do nerf something then it turns to shit for the next months

[XIIcorps]

Here's the thing.

If you buff enfields Commandos carry, the officers would make them far greater and too good. Thus it is far harder to balance the rifle they carry.

yeh but what other faction requires 3-6 pop of supplimentary support units to make them perform on par or slightly better then other inf ? none is your final answer.

[NightRain]

I'm fairly sure Airborne would love those with their M1 Carbines aka the worst rifle in game. That is when considering them as non-upgraded.

Thus, mandos do not necessarily need officer buffs, but they certainly benefit from them.

Since balance lead has changed I don't know if they'll be touched as it is. That is why it leaves the problem of Rifles vs Stens. Buffing rifles means they'll be better than tommies (Not a bad thing in my mind) But with officer buffs included, there is a risk that they start performing like Marines do. Hmm I wouldn't mind that to be fair.

[Hicks58]

You've mentioned twice about Officers, and by a dev it has been said that Brit Officers are getting hit with the nerf bat.

[NightRain]

You've mentioned twice about Officers, and by a dev it has been said that Brit Officers are getting hit with the nerf bat.

Fascinating, I would of thought with myst out of the seat there wouldn't be such changes.

[nikomas]

Fascinating, I would of thought with myst out of the seat there wouldn't be such changes.

I find it fascinating you're so sure he was put out of the seat, we didn't just kick him out like that. Asked him to work with the mystery one and now we're still waiting.

Efficiency and punishing sloth, not the dev teams virtue.