acker
|
|
« Reply #60 on: February 16, 2009, 03:32:12 pm » |
|
Since when has this game been realistic?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lionel-Richie
|
|
« Reply #61 on: February 16, 2009, 03:35:14 pm » |
|
meh, 57mm wasnt used all that much in the war, late part of it in 45.. would be more relistic to have airborne with zooks.
My point was that the 57mm wasn't some gigantic cannon slung on a strap fired from the hip while screaming a battle cry. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| acker
|
|
« Reply #62 on: February 16, 2009, 03:43:02 pm » |
|
That would be so awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #63 on: February 16, 2009, 03:49:30 pm » |
|
meh, 57mm wasnt used all that much in the war, late part of it in 45.. would be more relistic to have airborne with zooks.
My point was that the 57mm wasn't some gigantic cannon slung on a strap fired from the hip while screaming a battle cry. neither was the pzrshk.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPmAllied
509th Airborne
EIR Veteran Posts: 285
|
|
« Reply #64 on: February 16, 2009, 03:50:56 pm » |
|
The 57mm was field tested in '44....it was THE American ATG of the European Theater.
At this point the Germans were using a 7.5cm PAK40 for most AT work.
But I don't see Tread Breaker as being an issue, just played a game and it really had no impact at all. PAK guns ruled the anti-tank role completely, alongside their trusty schrek companions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
509th Airborne
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #65 on: February 16, 2009, 03:55:34 pm » |
|
The 57mm was field tested in '44....it was THE American ATG of the European Theater.
At this point the Germans were using a 7.5cm PAK40 for most AT work.
But I don't see Tread Breaker as being an issue, just played a game and it really had no impact at all. PAK guns ruled the anti-tank role completely, alongside their trusty schrek companions.
not talking about the M1.. talking about the RR. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPmAllied
509th Airborne
EIR Veteran Posts: 285
|
|
« Reply #66 on: February 16, 2009, 03:58:41 pm » |
|
Then yea, replaced for the most part with zooks. Just like most german formations had a ton of PF's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| acker
|
|
« Reply #67 on: February 16, 2009, 04:02:19 pm » |
|
I was under the impression that the 57mm RR began to replace the M1 Bazooka, not the other way around.
Until Korea, of course. Then they issued the 3.5-inch bazooka after the first few months.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #68 on: February 16, 2009, 04:05:06 pm » |
|
Ok... The M1 57mm is the 6pdr ATG... lol.. fyi.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #69 on: February 16, 2009, 04:06:19 pm » |
|
too many damn M1 names for american units, i was referring to the M1 57mm atg, or 6pdr lol.. sheesh..
also, why cant we get the Brits the 57mm? it was their ATG anyways?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPmAllied
509th Airborne
EIR Veteran Posts: 285
|
|
« Reply #70 on: February 16, 2009, 04:06:25 pm » |
|
Actually its not, its a redesign that can chamber American rounds. The 6pdr was similar and chambered British rounds.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #71 on: February 16, 2009, 04:15:30 pm » |
|
Actually its not, its a redesign that can chamber American rounds. The 6pdr was similar and chambered British rounds.
wonder, u think we could add the 57mm to the brits in this game? if i were a brit player i would rather have the 57mm than the 17pdr.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPmAllied
509th Airborne
EIR Veteran Posts: 285
|
|
« Reply #72 on: February 16, 2009, 04:16:52 pm » |
|
Only if they call it a 6pdr =)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
 Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #73 on: February 16, 2009, 04:19:54 pm » |
|
Actually its not, its a redesign that can chamber American rounds. The 6pdr was similar and chambered British rounds.
wonder, u think we could add the 57mm to the brits in this game? if i were a brit player i would rather have the 57mm than the 17pdr.. you can buy it in the armor reinforcement actually. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #74 on: February 16, 2009, 04:20:40 pm » |
|
Actually its not, its a redesign that can chamber American rounds. The 6pdr was similar and chambered British rounds.
wonder, u think we could add the 57mm to the brits in this game? if i were a brit player i would rather have the 57mm than the 17pdr.. you can buy it in the armor reinforcement actually. ya, in 30pp and we aint getting them now!!!! lololol. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #75 on: February 16, 2009, 04:56:16 pm » |
|
Dont start tweaking around with the stats. Balance it through cost or recharge time. IMo, cost i okay, but recharge time is too little.
apparently this got ignored. Oh well...now they are useless. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
| Two
|
|
« Reply #76 on: February 16, 2009, 05:11:22 pm » |
|
no, now the at ht stops tanks from charging at you and owning you, which gives you time to kill it but means the tank shot at isnt useless now
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #77 on: February 16, 2009, 05:46:24 pm » |
|
Thats what it did before. Now it just damages engines...which means the tank can keep going. And it can only do that once every 3(?) minutes...Stickies are a helluva lot cheaper with a much lower cooldown.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Khorney
|
|
« Reply #78 on: February 16, 2009, 05:48:39 pm » |
|
but at incredibly long range on a much faster platform, and IIRC 100% accuracy yes? but perhaps we should wait till we try stuff out ingame before judging on numbers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #79 on: February 16, 2009, 05:50:09 pm » |
|
Again. The ATHT doesn't serve ANY purpose except to take up pop if it isn't breaking treads. Since it can no longer break treads reliably, its useless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
