Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
October 31, 2024, 06:05:39 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 1
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 6
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
Please don’t open this th...
by
Shabtajus
[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
emplacements
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: emplacements (Read 9453 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
TheDeadlyShoe
Weapon of Math Destruction
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1399
emplacements
«
on:
March 23, 2009, 01:40:56 pm »
* Increase build time. it's absurd how quick they build. you can button something, build a 17 and have it taking shots before the button ends.
* Increase power of incendiary round (m-ht) and nebel flame against emplacements. They don't do enough right now. (Contrary to what some have said, nebels/incendiary rounds shouldn't be a direct counter to emplacements - that's what they were before, and it made emplacements unuseable.)
* Regular mortar damage seems about right. An emplacement can unpack under mortar fire, but you lose it if you delay at all.
* Slightly reduce the range on 17, bofors, vickers. -5 each. Perhaps -10 on 17.
----
Any thoughts?
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 01:49:47 pm by TheDeadlyShoe
»
Logged
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #1 on:
March 23, 2009, 01:47:56 pm »
the emplacements are only one problem the davs made by buffing piats, emplacements blahblah:
blobbing is more effective then it was before and than it was in EiR. and sim citying is also very popular again...especially mods exploit the uberness of e.g. empöacements, that means they know emplacements are uber right now. sad.
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 01:53:25 pm by aloha622
»
Logged
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #2 on:
March 23, 2009, 01:48:18 pm »
I would say make the build time slightly longer and the unpack time slightly shorter. Same rough time to redeploy, but more of that time is spent with the axis knowing you're vulnerable thus making emplacements a little easier to counter with indirect fire.
Logged
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:
Quote from: Akranadas
Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.
Quote from: Akranadas
We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
EliteGrens
EIR Veteran
Posts: 240
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #3 on:
March 23, 2009, 01:50:12 pm »
And fix the issue with the free full health when rebuilding.
Logged
Leafedge
EIR Veteran
Posts: 270
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #4 on:
March 23, 2009, 01:53:05 pm »
-20 on the 17 is too much. It is normally 64, and it is 80 now. It should be around 70 range. Right now it is actually superior to the 88, and that isn't good.
Agreed on the packing times, Mal.
I just played a game of EIRR, and it was honestly worse than Scheldt vcoh. I'm not playing vs Brits again until next patch. 17's are mobile, free repair 88s. Bofors are a combination ATG, Sniper, and MG, but with more range, also with free repair. It's ok to have emplacements be usable in EIR, but the current British are simply stupid. The game is unplayable.
Logged
Schultz
EIR Veteran
Posts: 679
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #5 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:03:01 pm »
Quote from: Leafedge on March 23, 2009, 01:53:05 pm
-20 on the 17 is too much. It is normally 64, and it is 80 now. It should be around 70 range. Right now it is actually superior to the 88, and that isn't good.
Agreed on the packing times, Mal.
I just played a game of EIRR, and it was honestly worse than Scheldt vcoh. I'm not playing vs Brits again until next patch. 17's are mobile, free repair 88s. Bofors are a combination ATG, Sniper, and MG, but with more range, also with free repair. It's ok to have emplacements be usable in EIR, but the current British are simply stupid. The game is unplayable.
QFT
I dunno what you guys were thinking before implementing the changes but i feel exactly like leaf does.
Logged
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #6 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:06:21 pm »
Yeah playing against brits is not fun anymore. I played today 3v3 on abbe, they made fucking new york city in the town, arty was like rain, sure u can win, but it looks like vcoh now, suicidal blob charges, arty spam, and sim cities, no fun for me.
Logged
Bubz
EIR Veteran
Posts: 726
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #7 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:08:18 pm »
I agree somehow but so is AC puma and IHT
Logged
Schultz
EIR Veteran
Posts: 679
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #8 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:16:03 pm »
I love the piats blob now. They kill anything. Tanks, infantry anything.
I made the mistake at closing down some volks to two piat squads, they died faster than they would have been smg rangers ! I dont view them as engees anymore, theyre leet infantry. My p4 is like cattle getting to the butcher. I have never seen something like it lol, piats make schreks absolute.
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 02:23:02 pm by Schultz
»
Logged
TheDeadlyShoe
Weapon of Math Destruction
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1399
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #9 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:19:47 pm »
Quote
17's are mobile, free repair 88s.
'free repair' is way overexaggerated. 88s are extremely resistant to artillery fire, moreso than 17s, although they can be decrewed by direct hits. plus 88s have more firepower and range.
note however that 88s take a frigging eon to build.
Quote
Bofors are a combination ATG, Sniper, and MG,
you said this before.. it was silly then, it's silly now. the bofors is not anything approaching an ATG or sniper. And it's great against infantry, but it has no suppression; it can't anti-blob.
P.S. almost forgot
17 pdr -> 5 pop.
Logged
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #10 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:26:54 pm »
Quote from: Bubz on March 23, 2009, 02:08:18 pm
I agree somehow but so is AC puma and IHT
usually, axis players dont suicide their units but use them tactically. ok, when u suicide rush an AC it wont do much damage because its weak. but when u suicide rush commandos, piat blobs (nearly every brit player has a piat blob in his company) they will rape!
Logged
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #11 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:31:06 pm »
From what I've seen, emplacements were overbuffed, piats has become a cheap type of RR on low population super cheap squads combined with the patheticness of the current skirts. Americans are looking like the most well-rounded faction atm
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 02:34:18 pm by Smokaz
»
Logged
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
TheDeadlyShoe
Weapon of Math Destruction
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1399
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #12 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:37:30 pm »
We only have 15 threads where people are bitching about piats. Please talk about emplacements.
Logged
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #13 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:38:48 pm »
btw about piats, 2 shots took more then half hp on my p4 that was fun.
Logged
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #14 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:39:05 pm »
allied buff+ axis buff= 'double' allied buff" or 'double' nerf on axis
our balancing team made a hardcore problem out of it
«
Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 02:40:38 pm by aloha622
»
Logged
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #15 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:42:48 pm »
1 anti building grenade killed my bofors from full health.. cheap way of removing a building.
Logged
www.synergiesmod.com
EscforrealityTLS
EIR Veteran
Posts: 593
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #16 on:
March 23, 2009, 02:54:39 pm »
That equation does not make sense.
Logged
Pwanawan baby!
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #17 on:
March 23, 2009, 03:01:04 pm »
ya i cried a little, but it was effective for the bugger!
Logged
Two
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2079
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #18 on:
March 23, 2009, 03:35:36 pm »
even in vcoh it takes more then 1 to kill a bofors
Logged
Quote
IplayForKeeps: if we were an equation
IplayForKeeps: it would be
IplayForKeeps: two = keeps
IplayForKeeps: i only have 1 friend
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
Re: emplacements
«
Reply #19 on:
March 23, 2009, 04:02:56 pm »
Quote from: Schultz on March 23, 2009, 02:03:01 pm
Quote from: Leafedge on March 23, 2009, 01:53:05 pm
-20 on the 17 is too much. It is normally 64, and it is 80 now. It should be around 70 range. Right now it is actually superior to the 88, and that isn't good.
Agreed on the packing times, Mal.
I just played a game of EIRR, and it was honestly worse than Scheldt vcoh. I'm not playing vs Brits again until next patch. 17's are mobile, free repair 88s. Bofors are a combination ATG, Sniper, and MG, but with more range, also with free repair. It's ok to have emplacements be usable in EIR, but the current British are simply stupid. The game is unplayable.
Double QFT!
QFT
I dunno what you guys were thinking before implementing the changes but i feel exactly like leaf does.
Logged
Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
Quote from: Malgoroth on October 10, 2011, 05:03:49 pm
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...