*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 19, 2024, 11:43:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Tiger ACE  (Read 8553 times)
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
boobaka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 151



« on: May 04, 2009, 12:36:21 pm »

Modify
the pak part is gone! Cheesy
I think the change to Tiger ACE is a bit much for the axis! Everyone that know me know that I play on both sides.

Before the change the tiger ace was a bit too much I agree with that but now it is too almost not worth getting! 6 pp to buy one and the vet is nerfed! ( i don't want to say the word nerfed but I have to here!!) compared to all the other axis tanks the vet is unfair. If you put more resources into one thing it should be better than the rest! and the xp amount to give the ACE vet is also "ridiculous" 100 xp for vet1 400 xp for vet2 and 800 xp for vet3. Just to point out that the King tiger only need 400 xp for vet3 and the pershing only needs 200xp for vet3. If the DEV team is about to take out the Tiger Ace from the game let us know or this NEED to be changed.

With the problems we have had in the past I am greatfull for the work the DEV team has put into the mod and I thank you all for the good and fast work you all did to solve the difficulties we have had but here is what I have to “bitch about” and I hope there will be some changes to this.


Tiger Ace (0.1)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.95
-Vet2 Penetration 1.05, Accuracy 1.05, Health 1.05
-Vet3 Received Penetration 0.95, Health 1.1

King Tiger (0.2)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.9
-Vet2 Accuracy 1.15, Health 1.1 Speed 1.15
-Vet3 Received Penetration 0.9, Speed 1.15

Pershing (0.4)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.85
-Vet2 Penetration 1.1, Accuracy 1.15, Health 1.2,
-Vet3 Received Penetration 0.8, Damage 1.2

Panther (0.3)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.9
-Vet2 Penetration 1.1, Accuracy 1.15, Received Damage 0.9
-Vet3 Speed 1.2,  Received Penetration .8

Tiger (0.3)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.9
-Vet2 Penetration 1.1, Accuracy 1.15, Health 1.15
-Vet3 Received Penetration 0.8, Turret Speed 1.1

it should not need double the XP for the tiger Ace to get less Cheesy
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 02:31:13 pm by boobaka » Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2009, 01:32:05 pm »

I've never seen a tiger ace since 0.4
it was fail before and now it is even more fail...


devs should just say that they do not want heavy tanks (except the pershing) and remove the other


the pershing is statswise a bit weaker than the tiger ace but is the same mixture.....fast, good vs infantry, good vs tanks...and it is a very cost effective shock unit (other than the tiger ace)
Logged
Schultz Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 679


« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2009, 01:53:08 pm »

There are other heavy tanks to compensate Tongue
Not that i dont agree with baka.
Dick man, chill with the negativity lol.
Logged
Mgallun74 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478


« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2009, 01:58:27 pm »

What BigDick and Aloha fail to recognize is... that the dudes at Relic made this game to heavily favor the axis units...   our lovely Devs here are just trying to balance it to were each side is pretty balanced... and well anyone who likes the german units and has a big bias to it, will see this as our devs playing favorites.. when in reality they are just trying to fix the main companys bias..
Logged

Illegal_Carrot Offline
Global Moderator
*
Posts: 1068


« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2009, 02:10:57 pm »

What BigDick and Aloha fail to recognize is... that the dudes at Relic made this game to heavily favor the axis units...   our lovely Devs here are just trying to balance it to were each side is pretty balanced... and well anyone who likes the german units and has a big bias to it, will see this as our devs playing favorites.. when in reality they are just trying to fix the main companys bias..
No, the vet requirements for the ACE (and the vet you get form it) are insane.
Here's the Vet for the Pershing, a comparable Allied heavy tank:
Pershing (0.4)
-Vet1 Received Damage 0.85
-Vet2 Penetration 1.1, Accuracy 1.15, Health 1.2,
-Vet3 Received Penetration 0.8, Damage 1.2
The ACE requires four times the XP to get to vet 3, yet gets much worse vet.

Also, lol at your idea of relic making the game in favor of Axis.
Logged

Quote
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk.
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2009, 02:11:32 pm »

dudes at Relic made this game to heavily favor the axis units...
u fail to recognize, obviously
Logged

chefarzt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1906



« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2009, 02:19:42 pm »

Btw dont forget that the pershing(armor company) also gets field repairs.
Logged


This community is full of a bunch of mindless idiots with memories like two year olds.

https://www.etsy.com/de/shop/ShitGlitter?ref=l2-shop-header-avatar
I'm not sure what you're so defensive about Tank.
 he makes shab look like a princess giving food to the poor.
boobaka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 151



« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2009, 02:26:26 pm »

doctrine ability is not the problem here! the argument is that the Tiger Ace cost/effective not right and the vet for it can't be compaired with other tanks.
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18378


« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2009, 02:26:36 pm »

Yes we are well aware of the Tiger Ace being likely overnerfed in its current state, it's not easy to find a middle ground as it's such a powerful unit. We will probably be re-evaluating all aspects of this unit sometime soon.

As for the PAK, the current change was a test, if we decide to keep it in its current form a price decrease may be expected in a near future. It would be nice though if you could keep all discussion regarding the PAK in a seperate thread.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 03:00:36 pm by Unkn0wn » Logged
Illegal_Carrot Offline
Global Moderator
*
Posts: 1068


« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2009, 02:33:41 pm »

dudes at Relic made this game to heavily favor the axis units...
u fail to recognize, obviously
I really don't want to derail this thread by talking about game balance, especially vCoH balance, but I really want to know how you think that Axis is in anyways OP.
Logged
Two Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2079


« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2009, 02:34:17 pm »

While your at it buff the KT Wink
Logged




Quote
IplayForKeeps: if we were an equation
IplayForKeeps: it would be
IplayForKeeps: two = keeps
IplayForKeeps: i only have 1 friend
Scyn Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1011


« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2009, 02:43:38 pm »

Btw dont forget that the pershing(armor company) also gets field repairs.

Field repairs is must-have. You play with 2 wehr and a PE player you can have 2 repair bunkers and a bergetiger easily taking 10 pop(team total)for 3.25rep speed where Americans have to have to have Expert Engies to get anywhere near that speed and they're 4pop per squad. you have to have 3 squads(12pop) to trump those speeds. Field Repairs is going to make it so Americans don't have to blob the shit out of engineers to repair their Tanks.. and why should they? Axis doesn't have to.
Logged

God is a genetically induced obsession that we interpret in such a way as to maintain our obedience.
chefarzt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1906



« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2009, 02:47:22 pm »

And another lolpost.
Logged
Mgallun74 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478


« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2009, 02:50:46 pm »

Tongue
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 02:52:37 pm by Mgallun74 » Logged
boobaka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 151



« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2009, 02:52:41 pm »

all post are lol post in the public forum, but i don't have DEV forum access! Tongue
and this is just for the Tiger ACE problem not doctrines.
plz if u don't have anything intelligent to say don't say anything...
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #15 on: May 04, 2009, 02:53:23 pm »

Tiger Ace fix.

Revert vet, make its speed the same as the Tiger. Increase its accuracy and acceleration.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
boobaka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 151



« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2009, 03:01:05 pm »

or have the same vet system with 0.2 like the KT and cost 4 pp
Logged
Killer344 Offline
The Inquisitor
*
Posts: 6904



« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2009, 03:22:39 pm »

TA fix? Make it 22 pop cap, make it cheaper (to not literally slaughter your company when you buy one), and buff its vet a bit.


Why the pop cap increase? Because there aren´t any hardcounters for the TA, it can literally decrew 57s with frontal shots on them.
Logged

If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
Malevolence Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1871



« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2009, 03:28:35 pm »

Quote
While your at it buff the KT

Yes, please.

Also, Tiger Ace vet is terrible. The price is fine, but the vet is crap. Buff vet = good to go. Don't buff its durability, just its accuracy or something. They aren't strapping additional armor plating onto the tank as the crew becomes more veteran, they learn to shoot the gun and drive the tank better...
Logged

Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:

Quote from: Akranadas
Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.

Quote from: Akranadas
We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
Schultz Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 679


« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2009, 03:32:35 pm »

Yeah well just remember what happened the previous time. Everybody that was anyone bought one. You saw more tiger aces that you would see bikes.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 03:49:27 pm by Schultz » Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 36 queries.