Doctrine Reworks & Unlocks Poll

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[EliteGren]

I remember when EIRR had no offmaps in 2009. Support spam galore

[3rdCondor]

Based on results.... all docs need rework. Pretty sure the devs know this tho

[PonySlaystation]

All doctrines do not need a complete rework but most of them has at least one tree that is completely useless or should be changed for other reasons.

[shockcoil]

Most of them are fine. I just played a few games with my old inf company and holy shit is it an amazing doctrine. Same with armour, same with most of them. The only one that sticks out is shitty shitty ab.

[PonySlaystation]

Armor is seriously underpowered.

[shockcoil]

Armour is amazing you shut the fuck up

[PonySlaystation]

How exactly? they have no buffs to riflemen, hmgs, mortars, snipers or atgs and HVAP pershing or M10s is not going to be enough for me to win a game.

[Hicks58]

How exactly? they have no buffs to riflemen, hmgs, mortars, snipers or atgs and HVAP pershing or M10s is not going to be enough for me to win a game.

All I've gotta say to that is L2P Armour. As a very long time player of Armour, I can tell you that the doctrines themselves are fine - The only problem with Armour is that it's a doctrine that focuses on the minimum fieldable unit type, which is any form of Armour. That is not a problem with the doctrine, that's a problem with access to resources.

[PonySlaystation]

I'm gonna try a different company build. But dual pershings sucks. I'm gonna try with seven M10 or M18s and see how that goes.

[Mister Schmidt]

Armour is amazing you shut the fuck up

+1, a nice steamy mug of l2p is in order.

[EliteGren]

Armour is amazing indeed, been using alot of T17s again recently. Such a fun unit to use

[shockcoil]

Top Gun croc kicks so much ass, Mobile warfare kicks ass, that HE rounds thing kicks ass. I've never played AP rounds but I heard that owns too. Mark target kicks ass, repairing while shooting vehicles owns. Dual repairs keeps your shit around forever. Armour also gives you maximum pool for amazing base units like quads and m8s. You don't need to buff riflemen, riflemen are just riflemen. Buy nades on all of them and go around killing shit, if they die who cares. ATGs with AP rounds too already very good. Sniper with mark target and +5 is an amazing buff for 1 T1s.

I win my games off good use of AI vehicles and old fashion atg pushing with riflemen doing what riflemen do best, which is basically everything. Pershings are a bit underwhelming though granted.

[PonySlaystation]

o'rly? what are the stats on your armor company?

[shockcoil]

15-3

EDIT: Sorry no 14-4 but to be fair I was 6-4 when started playing it again. I can only assume I was fucking up badly before trying to get the build right.

[Hicks58]

Pershing's can be total beasts in the correct hands... As I've said to people before, treat them like speedy Tigers, they are as good as their provided support.

I've had Pershings get 50 inf kills and atleast 5-7 HV kills to back it up... Then again, I've had a couple get ganked before they could even hit the field properly.

[RikiRude]

armor is fine, i could see it using some tweaks, but nothing major for it to be changed.

and i have to agree every doctrine needs some tweaking here and there, but not complete reworks for the most part.

armor for example, WP rounds need looking at as well as calling it in.

also my armor company is 26:26 which i think a 1:1 ratio is pretty good especially for me considering it was the first company i used when i came back. I've also tried all three T4s, and both dual T3s, and it's one of my favorite companies!