Katusha
|
|
« on: July 03, 2011, 02:28:20 pm » |
|
How much are ATG's affected by smoke? Is it worth using flammenwerfer HT in smoke, because from my experience ATG's still hit most of the time in smoke, can anyone confirm this?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2011, 02:30:12 pm » |
|
ATGs have less scatter than tank guns so are affected less by smoke.
you can perfectly use vehicles with phase armor vs atgs in smoke though like pumas and armored cars.
halftracks don't have phase armor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2011, 02:31:54 pm » |
|
but pumas won't hit anything while they're in smoke.. right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2011, 02:35:36 pm » |
|
Drop smoke in front of the atg then and drive behind it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2011, 02:38:50 pm » |
|
Too much hassle lol, can just flank it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2011, 02:47:46 pm » |
|
if u want things done easy go allied |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2011, 02:48:15 pm » |
|
flammenwerfers should get phase armor
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2011, 02:58:31 pm » |
|
flammenwerfers should get phase armor
and prettier skin,these ones are ugly like hell... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2011, 03:01:43 pm » |
|
i would not be against making flammenwerfer a doctrine unit, as long as it becomes useful...... i mean way more useful than now
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2011, 03:54:29 pm » |
|
Just dont use flammenwerfer till something interesting happens to it.
yer due to the low scatter and how smoke functions, you cant just sit infront of the smoke, it is kinda useless, better of just using a HT with 2 flame pios to do the same job.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2011, 04:01:12 pm » |
|
Just dont use flammenwerfer till something interesting happens to it.
yer due to the low scatter and how smoke functions, you cant just sit infront of the smoke, it is kinda useless, better of just using a HT with 2 flame pios to do the same job.
true but it's more expensive |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2011, 04:02:22 pm » |
|
Im just suggesting a similar solution using the same principle of rushing then dropping flames.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2011, 05:01:13 pm » |
|
just commenting on your similar solution |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2011, 10:02:39 am » |
|
ATGs have less scatter than tank guns so are affected less by smoke.
you can perfectly use vehicles with phase armor vs atgs in smoke though like pumas and armored cars.
halftracks don't have phase armor.
so this is why sherman smoke is shit useful!!!!! i feel atgs should be affected the same, but now its good to know that you only want to pop smoke if its hand held at or another tank going after you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2011, 10:19:40 am » |
|
so this is why sherman smoke is shit useful!!!!!
i feel atgs should be affected the same, but now its good to know that you only want to pop smoke if its hand held at or another tank going after you.
hmm, I actually checked the numbers now and atg scatter might not be that much less than tank scatter after all. but smoke is still better for atgs than for tanks if theyre fighting each other because of the tank's collision box. atg don't (or hardly) have one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2011, 10:29:02 am » |
|
can i ask why marders are so accurate vs at guns?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2011, 10:30:17 am » |
|
can i ask why marders are so accurate vs at guns?
must be the TH t3 that is giving them it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder |
|
|
Hicks58
Development
 Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2011, 10:33:39 am » |
|
can i ask why marders are so accurate vs at guns?
I've asked that before and the response I got was essentially L2P n00b. Funny that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2011, 10:37:02 am » |
|
can i ask why marders are so accurate vs at guns?
because marder has 0.5 acc modifier vs ATGs in corsix instead of 0.1 acc like other atgs have. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2011, 10:45:46 am » |
|
can i ask why ATG are so accurate vs marder than? should be 0.1 too like against other ATGs not 1000% of that like it is currently
i call bug tbh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
