[Wm] Tiger needs buffing

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[smurfORnot]

not saying ur wrong but:
challenge accepted


10.08.2011 deadbolt after lossing a chucko panther 12min ingame:

"deadboltssmurf: this mod is shit"
- ragequits -

 

 

[deadbolt]

not saying ur wrong but:
challenge accepted


10.08.2011 deadbolt after lossing a chucko panther 12min ingame:

"deadboltssmurf: this mod is shit"
- ragequits -

 

mod is shit tbh

[PonySlaystation]

All in favor of banning nugnug from the balance forum?

[Tymathee]

lmao as soon as i saw the thread title i said to myself "it's nug"

dang, you're getting obvious now

The Tiger is one of the highest skill tanks in the game. You can't just run it around the field and expect it to do well. You have to micro it, take care of it and have the right amount of support. If you don't, it's no one's fault but yours.

I"ve played against guys whose tigers i've raped in seconds and others who had a tiger out the whole game.

Nug, the tiger isn't fail, you are. You constantly whine about units that generally have a high skill range, so what's that say about you?

Heck, I'll admit it, I suck with the Tiger if you wanna throw somethin back at me. I don't like 'em, i suck with them, same with pershing and king tiger so i dont touch 'em, rather than whine "they're UP!" because i've seen what people can do with them that are good at using them. Either get better microing and supporting your tiger or find something else.

[Tymathee]

what would that help? the only "hard-target" a tiger need to fight is the pershing
the treats to a tiger are low armored high damage (insane dmg modifiers) and fast cheap tankdestroyers ak m10

a tiger has no real "tank" problems beside a firefly outranging it or m10s that are cheap with insane damage

these treats are not solved by buffing it vs tanks (but by supporting it with pak or doubleshrek storms)

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=treat

i think you were looking for threat.

[BigDick]

yeah thread treat threat tread whatever u english mens need to make clear language  

[Tymathee]

hey i didn't create the language, blame the british. theirs is even more horrific.

[deadbolt]

theirs*

[Tymathee]

yaya, whatever. i'm a writer. i should know better lol.

[Hicks58]

can people plz stop making threads about buffing tiger, it doesnt need buffing, it's fine as it is. if you think it needs buffing your shit at the game and need to l2p or l2micro.

This.

[Rahx]

This topic is full of shit

[EliteGren]

what... tiger up? WHAT?!
Have you seen the RoF with toggle?

LOL, 0.7s less reload. Yes that's so awesome..?

[nugnugx]

The thing that people keep sweeping under the rug is that if you get in two shrek hits on a m18, HVAP or not, its effectively out of the fight for a whole repair period.

Which i presume Smokaz that your Tiger comes with 2 Schreck mounts on top by default.

[DarkSoldierX]

LOL, 0.7s less reload. Yes that's so awesome..?

0.9 actually.

Which i presume Smokaz that your Tiger comes with 2 Schreck mounts on top by default.

You ALWAYS assume tiger is unsupported, and with your thinking if he is then its theory crafting.

 But somehow you theorycraft a fairyland were a lone tiger is dropped in Britain and has to hold off m10's and fireflies, which have support because if they didn't they couldn't fire outside of the tigers range anyway. And you dont even want to buff pershing at all. Its like somehow pershing deserves to cost more even though it has less hp, less splash, less penetration, and less armour.

The fact is your head is clouded my something. Its called bias.

[nugnugx]

You ALWAYS assume tiger is unsupported, and with your thinking if he is then its theory crafting.

Because this is the proper and only way of balancing a unit,  how he is effective alone, not with support.


If you will have 20 bazooka rangers from all players combined as 'support' and they 1 shot kill p4, does it mean bazooka is OP ? No.  This is why you don't balance on 'support' but by single unit, single weapon.

And you dont even want to buff pershing at all.

This is a tiger thread, if Pershing would be in a situation like Tiger he would require a buff, but he is not in the same situation.

[LeoPhone]

ok nug, with that argument I suggest to buff the mortar crewmember weapon to a fully functional mg42. since the mortar can simply be overrun by any unit without support.

[deadbolt]

i think bike should get reverse like jeep

[nugnugx]

ok nug, with that argument I suggest to buff the mortar crewmember weapon to a fully functional mg42. since the mortar can simply be overrun by any unit without support.

Mortars role is to get overruned by any unit so crewmember with mg is not needed because mortars fills its role ok.

[LeoPhone]

Mortars role is to get overruned by any unit so crewmember with mg is not needed because mortars fills its role ok.

no nug, mortar is useless without support thus its UP.

[nugnugx]

no nug, mortar is useless without support thus its UP.

Its role is to lob shells over obstacles to kill inf/support weapons. For the price it has and what he can do he is ok, 1 mortar can kill hmg/atg etc.
It is meant to die when others get close it.