*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 09:36:55 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [Wm] Tiger needs buffing  (Read 19249 times)
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Mister Schmidt Offline
Lawmaker
*
Posts: 5006



« Reply #40 on: August 11, 2011, 10:57:47 am »

Nug should be banned from balance again tbh.
Logged

and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #41 on: August 11, 2011, 11:00:29 am »

Its role is to lob shells over obstacles to kill inf/support weapons. For the price it has and what he can do he is ok, 1 mortar can kill hmg/atg etc.
It is meant to die when others get close it.


hmg cant kill mortar though indirectly so, i think mortar is op and mg is up.
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
velocity78 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 190



« Reply #42 on: August 11, 2011, 11:02:20 am »

massive derail tbh, and if the quality of this thread doesn't improve it will be locked.
Logged

3rdCondor- just hand out reward points and ppl will shut up 
tank130-How about people shut up and we hand out reward points... just a thought

Velocity, why you no let us do public lynching? Sad
Smurf has a serious fucking problem..
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #43 on: August 11, 2011, 11:02:25 am »

hmg cant kill mortar though indirectly so, i think mortar is op and mg is up.

HMGs role is to suppress/kill infantry.  Mortar is a counter to HMG.
Everything fine here.



--- and no more derail Leo, Keeps---
Logged

DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #44 on: August 11, 2011, 11:06:40 am »

Mortars role is to get overruned by any unit so crewmember with mg is not needed because mortars fills its role ok.
And Tiger fills its roll ok, it gibs all types of infantry and fights off pershings, all cromwells varients, 75% of sherman varients, and all churchill varients.

AKA tiger fights of 66% of the allied tank arsenal with more than reliable penetration(not including cct, caliope, reward tanks)

And thats assuming it ALWAYS looses to - Stuart, Tetartch, M10, M18, firefly


Problem, Nug?
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #45 on: August 11, 2011, 11:07:56 am »

And Tiger fills its roll ok, it gibs all types of infantry and fights off pershings, all cromwells varients, 75% of sherman varients, and all churchill varients.

AKA tiger fights of 66% of the allied tank arsenal with more than reliable penetration(not including cct, caliope, reward tanks)

And thats assuming it ALWAYS looses to - Stuart, Tetartch, M10, M18, firefly


Problem, Nug?

trolled into winning our arguement for us nug, kthxbye.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #46 on: August 11, 2011, 11:16:19 am »

And Tiger fills its roll ok, it gibs all types of infantry and fights off pershings, all cromwells varients, 75% of sherman varients, and all churchill varients.

AKA tiger fights of 66% of the allied tank arsenal with more than reliable penetration(not including cct, caliope, reward tanks)

And thats assuming it ALWAYS looses to - Stuart, Tetartch, M10, M18, firefly


Problem, Nug?

Pershing>Tiger so one less.  It can only go against Cromwells and non Upgun shermans and churchills tend to bounce him so they usualy escape.A well microed tet can also put on hurt on Tiger, and people usualy drop them by 2 numbers.
2 tanks he can go up against no problem that would be a drop to about 25% of allied arsenal.
Now pershing for comparison -   kills puma , kills p4 , kills panther, kills stug, kills 50mm ht, and if a player can micro he can kill marder and hetzer by circling them due to the speed of pershing.
That's 7 units in total with which he does not have problem vs 2 of Tigers. The only hurt that can be put on persh is by jag or KT.
That is without doctrine abilities, now you can go and check what doctrine stuff gets persh and what tiger gets.

If Persh is an effective AT and AI tank, why Tiger cannot be also an effective AT tank?

Problem, Darksoldier?
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #47 on: August 11, 2011, 11:19:48 am »

Pershing>Tiger so one less.  It can only go against Cromwells and non Upgun shermans and churchills tend to bounce him so they usualy escape.A well microed tet can also put on hurt on Tiger, and people usualy drop them by 2 numbers.
2 tanks he can go up against no problem that would be a drop to about 25% of allied arsenal.
Now pershing for comparison -   kills puma , kills p4 , kills panther, kills stug, kills 50mm ht, and if a player can micro he can kill marder and hetzer by circling them due to the speed of pershing.
That's 7 units in total with which he does not have problem vs 2 of Tigers. The only hurt that can be put on persh is by jag or KT.
That is without doctrine abilities, now you can go and check what doctrine stuff gets persh and what tiger gets.

If Persh is an effective AT and AI tank, why Tiger cannot be also an effective AT tank?

Problem, Darksoldier?

Are you serious? Do you even know basic math?

Right after im done with this game im going to school you so hard.
Logged
Audemed Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 644



« Reply #48 on: August 11, 2011, 11:20:14 am »

Oh nug, I see why you were balance-bant in the first place.
Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #49 on: August 11, 2011, 11:21:44 am »

nug your just a fuckin retard at times tbh.
Logged
Rahx Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1147



« Reply #50 on: August 11, 2011, 11:23:00 am »

nug your just a fuckin retard at times tbh.
Logged

why is everyone except me retarded?
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #51 on: August 11, 2011, 11:27:48 am »

nug your just a fuckin retard all times tbh.
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #52 on: August 11, 2011, 11:29:23 am »

at least he is right in saying the pershing is a bit better in direct comparison us/wehr than the tiger....

but only because he has not to deal with m10s especially when it comes to repairing
Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #53 on: August 11, 2011, 11:37:15 am »

at least he is right in saying the pershing is a bit better in direct comparison us/wehr than the tiger....

but only because he has not to deal with m10s especially when it comes to repairing

so?

some axis units are a bit better in direct comparison with other allied units, its the whole point so factions dont just become mirrored.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #54 on: August 11, 2011, 11:41:10 am »

so?
Pershing is cheaper but it is more effective in current metagameplay and the fact that allied tank destroyers got heavily buffed is affecting Tiger more than other units because:

A) it does not have range
B) it does not have speed
C) it does not have armor of other heavy tanks

These are the 3 main reasons.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2011, 11:44:12 am by nugnugx » Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #55 on: August 11, 2011, 11:47:11 am »

Pershing>Tiger so one less.  It can only go against Cromwells and non Upgun shermans and churchills tend to bounce him so they usualy escape.A well microed tet can also put on hurt on Tiger, and people usualy drop them by 2 numbers.
2 tanks he can go up against no problem that would be a drop to about 25% of allied arsenal.
Now pershing for comparison -   kills puma , kills p4 , kills panther, kills stug, kills 50mm ht, and if a player can micro he can kill marder and hetzer by circling them due to the speed of pershing.
That's 7 units in total with which he does not have problem vs 2 of Tigers. The only hurt that can be put on persh is by jag or KT.
That is without doctrine abilities, now you can go and check what doctrine stuff gets persh and what tiger gets.

If Persh is an effective AT and AI tank, why Tiger cannot be also an effective AT tank?

Problem, Darksoldier?

Pershing and tiger gun are different in splash, target tables, and penetration.

Tiger Vs Pershing
______________
Pershing penetration vs tiger at long range is = 45% Not favorable

Tiger penetration vs pershing at long range is =  58.45% Favorable

Tiger takes pershing to 5% in 7 shots.

Pershing takes tiger to 5% in 8 shots.

TIGER WINS!(unless you get out micro'd)

Tiger vs Retreating Churchills(is there any other kind when a tiger appears?)
_______________
Tiger chance to penetrate Church at long range = 69.305% more than Likely

Churchill 6p chance to penetrate tiger REAR at CLOSE range = 33.066%  Hermut! they are scratching our paintjob!

Churchill 75mm chance to penetrate tiger REAR at CLOSE range = 48.4%

Tiger puts IV/VI/AVRE in 5% in 5 shots

Tiger puts Croc in 5% in 7 shots

_______________

Yeah rush a marder, you'll kill it but it wont be cost effective.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2011, 11:49:35 am by DarkSoldierX » Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #56 on: August 11, 2011, 11:54:11 am »

Quote
Tiger takes pershing to 5% in 7 shots.

Pershing takes tiger to 5% in 8 shots.

TIGER WINS!(unless you get out micro'd)

to do with pershing speed,and tigers slow aiming,it's not been once,that pershing zoomed,pooped shoot,and then moved back before tiger could shot him back,so actually pershing will beat tiger with a bit of micro.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #57 on: August 11, 2011, 11:54:27 am »

Darksoldier i'm pretty sure your stats are incorrect as persh got 0.9 long pen and tiger 0.83 pen.

And if you talk also about splash,  pershing got bigger splash on medium and close range than Tiger.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2011, 11:57:59 am by nugnugx » Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #58 on: August 11, 2011, 11:58:46 am »

Darksoldier i'm pretty sure your stats are incorrect as persh got 0.9 long pen and tiger 0.83 pen.
Im pretty sure your brain is derp as you wont even do the math yourself as see I am correct.

to do with pershing speed,and tigers slow aiming,it's not been once,that pershing zoomed,pooped shoot,and then moved back before tiger could shot him back,so actually pershing will beat tiger with a bit of micro.
Tiger and pershing have same aimtime. What do you mean?
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #59 on: August 11, 2011, 12:08:39 pm »

Tiger and pershing have same aimtime. What do you mean?

he speaks about the rotation of the turret where the pershing got 32% faster rotation additional to the 9% faster rotation of the tank
that makes it 43% faster to point at the target when the gun shows into an other direction on contact

aditional the pershing has 25% more speed that makes him theoretically being able to escape when he feels loosing in direct tiger/pershing combat or able to chase the tiger
« Last Edit: August 11, 2011, 12:10:18 pm by BigDick » Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 36 queries.