*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2024, 02:52:56 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Upgun Puma -1 pop  (Read 10512 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« on: August 11, 2011, 09:42:59 pm »

I would suggest lowering the population of this to 7.

It's yet been successfully introduced to the game. You very seldom see it.

It's not a bad unit but the pop is prohibitive for its low health, survivability and mediocre weapon.
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2011, 09:58:11 pm »

it needs it. it doesnt really get any buffs from any of the doctrines, extra repair from blitz, and slightly more damage from terror, but thats it. its a good unit, but it needs some help to get used. i think the pricing is fair, but dropping its pop cap would help, you can send them out in pairs and wouldnt be hurting yourself with 16 pop, only 14.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2011, 10:05:15 pm »

Wouldn't hurt to loose a pop.

+1

And smokaz finally said something that isn't crazy.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2011, 10:10:39 pm »

Definitely doesn't deserve the same pop as the Stug
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
jackmccrack Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2484


« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2011, 10:21:02 pm »

-1


pop
Logged

Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2011, 10:49:38 pm »

And smokaz finally said something that isn't crazy.

kind of disappointing isn't it?
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2011, 11:28:47 pm »

the allied fanboy agrees
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
spinn72 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802



« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2011, 12:29:14 am »

I love them against brits. nom nom everything.
But yes, 8 pop is ridiculous.
Logged
Malgoroth Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 960


« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2011, 01:19:54 am »

Pop could be lowered to 6 and I still wouldn't use it tbh. But that's just me. As it stands, it definitely isn't worth 8 atm.

As an aside... does anyone remember immediately after OF came out when stugs and walking stukas had really good accuracy and damage modifiers against British infantry? EiR should bring that shit back  Wink
Logged
Groundfire Offline
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511



« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2011, 05:32:34 am »

Will bring this to the BT since it seems popular.
Logged

Latest Shoutcast:
EIRR Groundcast 11 "The Super Dev Showdown!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGm79rXWhU (full version)

LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2011, 05:50:33 am »

the BT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPyOvxpZ_xE&feature=related
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2011, 05:54:50 am »

lol if i i'd start this thread it would be it's a 'nug thread' etc
Logged

PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2011, 05:59:49 am »

lol if i i'd start this thread it would be it's a 'nug thread' etc

Not likely, you have no conception of balance so the chances of you posting a balance thread about a unit that's actually underpowered are very low.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2011, 06:01:51 am »

Not likely, you have no conception of balance so the chances of you posting a balance thread about a unit that's actually underpowered are very low.

I already made a thread with puma some time ago,  selective memory ftw Pony.

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=20336.0
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2011, 06:08:48 am »

I already made a thread with puma some time ago,  selective memory ftw Pony.

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=20336.0

The upgun puma was the only one that made sense.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2011, 06:10:12 am »

Yet your previous argument was proven wrong and you still keep banging your head against the wall.
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2011, 06:20:33 am »

Yet your previous argument was proven wrong and you still keep banging your head against the wall.

No, you did NOT create a thread about the upgun puma. You created a thread about several units that you deemed underpowered and in reality most of them were not, the upgun just happened to be one of them. You also didn't say why they were underpowered and what could be done to fix it which is key when writing a balance thread.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2011, 06:26:07 am »

Your argument was that I
Quote
have no conception of balance...about a unit that's actually underpowered
If that was true there wouldn't be puma nor assault grens which should have a big priority for buffing.
Don't change your argument now when you were proven wrong.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2011, 09:09:15 am »

Your argument was that I If that was true there wouldn't be puma nor assault grens which should have a big priority for buffing.
Don't change your argument now when you were proven wrong.

i think though, if you complain about enough units being UP, math says you'll eventually say one is UP that everyone else agree is UP.  Cheesy
Logged
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2011, 09:40:53 am »

i think though, if you complain about enough units being UP, math says you'll eventually say one is UP that everyone else agree is UP.  Cheesy

Refer to my dartboard metaphor. :p

Any chance of this being moved to balance? This is more of a balance discussion than an actual suggestion tbh.

Btw, I approve of lowering the pop, these things are seldom used. For their actual price they are half decent but they are a bitch to field at 8 pop. Lowering to 6-7 would be fine.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 36 queries.