*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2024, 12:59:52 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [Brit] ANZAC Infantry  (Read 7542 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Contaminator Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 161



« on: November 26, 2011, 08:13:18 pm »

I recently got some ANZAC infantry... called them on late game of a win. they took some damage but did fine. Called them in again on a different game they did not do so well. I had an officer with them and another rifle gren squad. they got trolololed by two gren squads.

so how in gods name are they supposed to be used... too squish for assault and they have smgs... so long range is out. some strategies would be nice because they seem like a non-typical brit unit which hopefully will keep things interesting but as of right now confusing.
Logged

the nashorn is like a kid with a giant penis, it has no idea how to use it or where to point it most of the time but it could still fuck you
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2011, 08:46:49 pm »

Slap em in a Bren Carrier.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
Contaminator Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 161



« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2011, 08:55:54 pm »

sweet... i was thinking that. on a side note: is there a reason their guns look like thompson/stens melted together... developer joke? or just an oops?
Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2011, 08:58:00 pm »

Lol no.

thats called Australian weapon design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_submachine_gun
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2011, 09:20:00 pm »

The only issue I see with them is that they get Airborne armour which doesn't benefit their anti infantry nature as much.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
Contaminator Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 161



« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2011, 09:20:44 pm »

haha lol! .22 cal smg? useless... magazine out the top seems counter intuitive... kinda why i questioned its existence.
Logged
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2011, 09:28:13 pm »

The only issue I see with them is that they get Airborne armour which doesn't benefit their anti infantry nature as much.

Airborne armour gives you reduced incoming accuracy on the move, and gives you reduced damage to a lot of small arms.

I'd say that's pretty well suited for a unit that needs to close the distance. Once it's point blank then the DPS does the talking rather than any form of armour.
Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2011, 07:30:18 am »

AB Armor only helps against small arms lol. you can't get any better for a close range AI squad.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2011, 09:15:39 am »

AB Armor only helps against small arms lol. you can't get any better for a close range AI squad.
Thats debatable.

Elite armor doesn't have to move to gain its acc bonus, but has vulnerabilities to a select few other weapons.

And heroic armor, admittedly takes slightly more DPS, takes half the suppression, which I think is a lot better by my preference.

Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2011, 09:17:05 am »

heroic armor would also increase the price of the squad to ridiculous levels...
Logged
Contaminator Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 161



« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2011, 10:04:18 pm »

played with them a bit more... it would be awesome if they were a tad sturdier since they are only a 4 man squad. they dont take damage well even on the move. but what ever they still fun.
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2011, 12:05:07 am »

they should be the KCH of the allied side, like common, they are the best soldiers in the world, nothing like weak Norwegians.
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2011, 12:38:33 am »

heroic armor would also increase the price of the squad to ridiculous levels...

ridiculous? they're 215-95 right now right? 4 man kch are 380-140 so if they go any higher than that it's BS and if they're equal its BS as well because 4man kch get assault, med packs and fausts, while anzacs get along with their normal gun....what?
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Contaminator Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 161



« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2011, 01:02:11 am »

they actually can get nades... but that makes them 120 mun (i think) but its their death sentence if you stop to throw nade so i dont get them. and i use them as close dps assault with another riflesquad and LT even then they dont come out so well.
they should be the KCH of the allied side
wouldnt be against the idea if they got kch stats without the assault and medpack deal, just their grenades. would make them much more useful but you still wouldnt see many of them cause of the reward status so axis tears would only flow sometimes and like kch could be delt with pretty easily if played right.

ANZAC - "gunna kill you the down undah way"

Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2011, 02:39:40 am »

I have to say for a reward unit, i was not impressed at all. its like a 4 man ranger squad give them another dude, or more health and raise the MP cost to like 280.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2011, 07:18:14 am »

its a brit airbourne sqaud, they rape some next level face if you use them correctly.
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2011, 07:36:03 am »

ANZAC infantry suck. Make them 5 or 6 man squads.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 36 queries.