Audemed
Donator
Posts: 644
|
« on: January 07, 2012, 01:47:12 pm » |
|
8 pop? I'd have to assume that this is a bug, as there's no way it should be as much as the stug.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hans
|
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2012, 01:49:17 pm » |
|
this peace of a vehicle is OP, so the price is totally right
|
|
|
Logged
|
Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2012, 01:54:31 pm » |
|
dont you know that puma is OP? it has been 8 pop for at least 2 years...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Audemed
Donator
Posts: 644
|
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2012, 01:56:16 pm » |
|
lol...........
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2012, 02:43:28 pm » |
|
yep upgunned puma fantastic tankdestroyer almost as good as the legendary panzer4 so pop is justified maybe even need to be increased to 9 to make it fitting between stug and m10 better
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hans
|
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2012, 02:44:56 pm » |
|
i guess all could get the point and we close this thread
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2012, 02:51:22 pm » |
|
jesus, another puma thread.
devs have too much on their plate it seems to bother with this... ever.
/end thread, please for the love of god. I can't stand the sight of another one of these threads.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2012, 05:02:12 pm » |
|
They don't seem OP by themselves but if they went down to 7 pop imagine the triple puma + 4pop starts
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2012, 05:11:31 pm » |
|
uuuu,scary...NOT
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spartan_Marine88
|
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2012, 05:11:36 pm » |
|
christ they can penetrate most tanks, do nice amounts of damage and if you learn how to stop and fire will snipe infantry about as well as a panther.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2012, 05:17:41 pm » |
|
7 pop puma plox
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2012, 05:37:23 pm » |
|
Give it P4 gun and health buff, then it can be like Chaffee..
|
|
|
Logged
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2012, 06:27:42 pm » |
|
Sure, lets make a non doctrinal Armoured Car like a reward Light Tank.
-.-'
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
PonySlaystation
|
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2012, 06:55:33 pm » |
|
It shouldn't be 8 pop. It performs a lot worse than a stug or a greyhound. It should be 7 pop.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2012, 09:36:44 pm » |
|
Sure, lets make a non doctrinal Armoured Car like a reward Light Tank.
-.-'
Armored Car/Light tank/Elephant/Rabbit etc, means NOTHING. All that counts are statistics. You could make a pink fluffy bunny with the same stats as a KT and it would be a KT. Why not give it the offensive ability of the Chaffee with less HP and worse armor? Kill it with HMGs or zooks.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2012, 09:47:31 pm » |
|
Armored Car/Light tank/Elephant/Rabbit etc, means NOTHING. All that counts are statistics. You could make a pink fluffy bunny with the same stats as a KT and it would be a KT.
Why not give it the offensive ability of the Chaffee with less HP and worse armor? Kill it with HMGs or zooks.
The issue with the chaffe isnt the armour, its the maneuverability it has with its firepower. In reality, you would be creating a superior chaffee, which is already a bit OP.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2012, 09:51:57 pm » |
|
How would it be a super chaffee?
It would be slower, worse health, damaged by more weapons, have worse offroad performance and slower turret rotation.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2012, 10:00:46 pm » |
|
Sorry, I assumed it was supposed to have higher maneuverability with the lesser HP and armour.
Proboly wont happen anyway, and not like id want it to. That type of change is alot bigger than the pgren change.
A reward unit equivalent could be in order though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2012, 11:15:58 pm » |
|
Here is what I want... A useful wher LV... Because fuck, I hate LV's and even I find allied hounds, stags and those ostwinds (T17's, and now audemed can also tell you how good they can be) in disguise great
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
|
|
|
Valexandes
Donator
Posts: 280
|
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2012, 11:41:10 pm » |
|
meh wehr makes up for lack of good LV with cloaking atg. They very handily take out those pesky light vehicles.
|
|
|
Logged
|
the nashorn is like a kid with a giant penis, it has no idea how to use it or where to point it most of the time but it could still fuck you
Your mom, and your grandma wont know....
|
|
|
|