*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 09, 2024, 05:12:57 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [PE] Stummel  (Read 15965 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« on: April 30, 2011, 10:56:03 am »

Now I don't have much issue with the unit but I feel they're in the wrong doctrine. Tank Hunters is obviously a tank/vehicle killing doctrine, yet you give it a really strong AI unit thus giving it improved all around capabilities and strengthening it where it was once weak.

Jagds and Hetzers #1 nemesis are ATG but if you have a pair of stummels, forget it they're done.

I think it should be moved over to SE, the 4man mg42 team removed, which doesn't fit PE anyway and Stummel's fit SE's theme of being the AI doctrine of PE
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2011, 11:06:31 am »


Jagds and Hetzers #1 nemesis are 57mm with APR but if you have a pair of stummels, forget it they're done.


Fixed


But yea i agree that the strummel is quite bullshit for being able to snipe the shit out of every and cant rvrn beat an m8.
Logged

Quote from: Grundwaffe
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Smiley
Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.

Work Harder
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2011, 11:08:10 am »

That's not what he said
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
Groundfire Offline
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511



« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2011, 11:08:32 am »

Valid point but SE already has super ISTs which have the same function.

The Stummel just fills a role in TH for a price, which was the idea. Having one doctrinal unlock that is (at least) decent at AI doesnt detract from Tank Hunters as a primarlily AT doctrine.
Logged

Latest Shoutcast:
EIRR Groundcast 11 "The Super Dev Showdown!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGm79rXWhU (full version)

Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2011, 11:15:38 am »

Valid point but SE already has super ISTs which have the same function.

The Stummel just fills a role in TH for a price, which was the idea. Having one doctrinal unlock that is (at least) decent at AI doesnt detract from Tank Hunters as a primarlily AT doctrine.

if it was just decent, yes but it's a really good AI unit which takes away one of the major weaknesses that tank hunters have which is AT infantry and ATG's, it kills them too well.

Also, as for the super ist's, that really needs to be fixed. Solution, get rid of mobile lockdown, give SE STummels, fits same role, ISTS can keep the +5 range and flame rounds, done. Nice and balanced.
Logged
Malgoroth Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 960


« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2011, 11:53:22 am »

ISTs are fine. The stummel however, is not. If ever there was a unit that epitomizes "unbalanced"... the stummel is it.

Nerf it accordingly (lower splash, OR less accuracy, OR less range, OR a less severe mix of all) and it would fit in TH just fine.
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2011, 11:57:05 am »

make one of the t3 in SE give stummel moving turret


!win
Logged

Groundfire Offline
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511



« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2011, 12:19:22 pm »

ISTs are fine. The stummel however, is not. If ever there was a unit that epitomizes "unbalanced"... the stummel is it.

Nerf it accordingly (lower splash, OR less accuracy, OR less range, OR a less severe mix of all) and it would fit in TH just fine.

Ok, ill forward this to the coders.

ON the stummel, so we know what to do, would you guys think it acceptable to make the gun on the stummel identical to the 75mmGMC?  I thought they were but it seems as if the stummel is just all around better. (Ive only used it a handful of times) Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2011, 12:22:52 pm »

One thing I noticed is strumel also doesnt have arty charateristic. If it scores hit then it flies towards a moving target,  effectively killing dudes.

Sturmel is OP, it gets the amount of kills a P4/sherman(Sometimes more) gets when it cost a 1/4th the fuel.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2011, 12:25:40 pm »

I haven't used them, but have fought them quite a few times, I think lowering splash and accuracy would be best since this unit doesn't have a turret so that would make it use its range as its main advantage. but then again if you do that, then you just had an upgunned puma with out its turret. It's really hard to say what to do to this unit to keep it balanced and unique. And I have to agree with tym, it seems out of place in the TH doctrine, but i feel that is a totally separate issue in regards to balancing it.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
chefarzt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1906



« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2011, 12:26:19 pm »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jrKXf2G-AA
Btw StuHma is retardedly useless.
Just saying.
kthxbye
Logged


This community is full of a bunch of mindless idiots with memories like two year olds.

https://www.etsy.com/de/shop/ShitGlitter?ref=l2-shop-header-avatar
I'm not sure what you're so defensive about Tank.
 he makes shab look like a princess giving food to the poor.
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2011, 12:39:51 pm »

Are you talking about the strumm or StuH?

If stuh use Focus fire on ground and every shot is like allmost an arty shell that gibbes blobs to death
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2011, 12:48:14 pm »

One thing I noticed is strumel also doesnt have arty charateristic. If it scores hit then it flies towards a moving target,  effectively killing dudes.

Sturmel is OP, it gets the amount of kills a P4/sherman(Sometimes more) gets when it cost a 1/4th the fuel.

Isn't the same thing true for stags/t17=?
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2011, 01:26:43 pm »

No you herpderp the sturmmel gets more than those, at a much longer range. The T17 and stag usualy have to be used at around 0-10 range, while the strummel snipes way at 40.
Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2011, 02:07:39 pm »

So does the GMC, except at 60?
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2011, 03:03:36 pm »

whatttt, there's no way the gmc has more ranger than the stummel!
Logged
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2011, 03:06:27 pm »

The Gmc has massive range but the bad thing is that its sight is shit to nothing
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2011, 03:58:49 pm »

whatttt, there's no way the gmc has more ranger than the stummel!

it has same range as strummel and does slightly more base damage than strummel but worse accuracy
« Last Edit: April 30, 2011, 04:02:51 pm by BigDick » Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2011, 04:07:43 pm »

Stummel has 50

GMC has 60 (or is supposed to have)

American:
-GMC 75mm population cost lowered to 5
-GMC 75mm scatter angel lowered to 5
-GMC 75mm range increased to 60 m.
Logged
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2011, 04:10:36 pm »

Just checked the RGD's, GMC has 50.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 36 queries.