*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 28, 2024, 11:00:45 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Puma  (Read 5698 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« on: June 27, 2012, 03:53:44 pm »

So I've taken some love to this little tank hunter, but I wonder one thing, why does almost no doctrine touch it?

Allied docs across the board buff their vehicles much more, even operation overlord grants a -15% rec acc to light vehicles and that's from an infartry focus company, axis has nothing but speed buffs for the puma and while terror does have a -15% rec pen, it does nothing since a puma cant even bounce T17 rounds... T17 rounds! That's fine mind you, it shouldn't have much armor.


So anyway, I'm really just asking here, is there any specific reason why the puma is barely touched by any doc aside from the odd speed/accel buff?
« Last Edit: June 27, 2012, 03:55:42 pm by nikomas » Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2012, 03:59:07 pm »

Terror gives a +15% damage in neutral/enemy territory.
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2012, 04:03:28 pm »

what would you buff on the puma? its already hard to hit and usually takes 3-4 shots to kill it from a TD and 2 atgs.

I think the puma is fine currently they are a horror with my AB damned RR's.
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2012, 04:08:47 pm »

Ah, forgot that one spartan, point still stands thou.
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2012, 05:06:51 pm »

I think the puma is fine currently they are a horror with my AB damned RR's.

They were designed to be the direct counter to AB, so i should hope so. That being said, it needs more
Logged
3rdCondor Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1536


« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2012, 08:21:14 pm »

turret rotation buff to match it's speed buff?
Logged

No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
lionel23 Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1854


« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2012, 08:24:05 pm »

Don't forget the Puma gun has been changed to match the PE Armored Car, so it's way more reliable at killing infantry than before.  Other than a 'T17' which can semi-rapid fire, allies have nothing that mows down units like this, and the Quad doesn't count (it doesn't mow down guys but rather mass suppresses) while every other vehicle is equipped with a slow firing .50 cal.
Logged

Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)

NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2012, 05:09:00 am »

Don't forget the Puma gun has been changed to match the PE Armored Car, so it's way more reliable at killing infantry than before.  Other than a 'T17' which can semi-rapid fire, allies have nothing that mows down units like this, and the Quad doesn't count (it doesn't mow down guys but rather mass suppresses) while every other vehicle is equipped with a slow firing .50 cal.

PE and Puma Acs have the same gun. The only diff is Speed and MG.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2012, 05:26:08 am »

The WM Puma has 50 more health at 310 health where the PE AC has 260 health.

WM Puma has max speed of 6.4 with acceleration of 4.5 whereby the PE AC has 7.5 speed and 6 acceleration.

As of a recent patch weapon loadouts are now identical, both maingun and coaxial MG - They were made in line with the PE AC. The only difference in main gun performance between the two is that the PE AC has 0.65 moving accuracy whilst the WM Puma has 0.5. Everything else is identical.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2012, 12:04:15 pm »

puma rocks tbh
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
UndeathWrath Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 284



« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2012, 09:00:15 am »

Puma is a unit with potential yet very fragile.

I would like to see some doctrine buffs for it encouraging its use.

Also think the upgun should be reduced to at least 7 pop from 8 (2 light ATs for 16 pop is way too much)
Logged



tank130:
oh noessss....I can't counter your big, unmovable anti tank gun with my much smaller, mobile, and cheaper anti tank gun.......
WTF... the horrors of imbalance.......
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2012, 11:25:44 am »

u pay that much for 2 tetrarchs and stuarts.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2012, 11:31:53 am »

Puma got a .75 moving acc buff from .50 the gun wasn't changed.

Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
I2ay Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 626



« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2012, 12:46:55 pm »

Its fragile if it ever gets hit, M10s will miss almost every shot if they're moving and even at guns aren't that reliable in hitting them. Just keep your pumas moving and be aware of where the enemies at guns are and its pretty easy to wreak havoc with pumas...
Logged



Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2012, 12:52:35 pm »

Quote
So anyway, I'm really just asking here, is there any specific reason why the puma is barely touched by any doc aside from the odd speed/accel buff?
Allies have more light vehicles to play with, WM only really have the puma. I suppose, with it being the only real LV, most axis doctrines don't cater to light vehicles like the allied ones do. If you look closely there are more abilities affecting the puma than at a first glance however, i.e  abilities that will also affect halftracks ('light vehicles') and sometimes just 'vehicles' (this includes tanks). It's just never really listed specifically in a buff.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #15 on: June 29, 2012, 01:13:55 pm »

Maybe it should be included into buffs that affect tanks then?
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2012, 10:57:47 am »

Maybe it should be included into buffs that affect tanks then?

+1
Logged
puddin Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1701



« Reply #17 on: July 08, 2012, 07:22:47 am »

Its fragile if it ever gets hit, M10s will miss almost every shot if they're moving and even at guns aren't that reliable in hitting them. Just keep your pumas moving and be aware of where the enemies at guns are and its pretty easy to wreak havoc with pumas...

That shows how little you play with this unit. 

So far i have found 1 thing true, The puma is a magnet for tank shots.  Especially the M-18s.  I had 2 M-18s hunting 4 pumas, and they never missed.  I had double repairs and burned through all my pumas to M-18s. 

Now for a cheap unit i expect it it to die in 2-3 hits, but the speed to get away i pay for the repairs, but for everything to hit it.... 

I would love to test this with someone at some point and prove the pumas were hit with some kind of change that does not make anythign really phase through them anymore,.
Logged

Puddin' spamtm
i cant really blame smokaz i mean playing against puddin is like trying to fight off breast cancer. You might win and do it and be a bad ass but you'll feel sick and mutilated forever.

Puddin' spamtm is soulcrushing... what's hard to understand about that?
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #18 on: July 08, 2012, 10:38:57 am »

i personally haven't used the new pumas but played against someone who was spamming them and they are awesome!

upgun pumas still get that MG buff, so they can whittle away at enemies pretty well, they have low damage but good penetration when they hit a vehicle. And regular pumas well, they tear through infantry.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #19 on: July 08, 2012, 12:15:55 pm »

Indeed since allies Stickies are only good at vet2 and handheld is doctrinal and i dont see the point in bringing 1 zook. There are those times when it just plain outright sucks to against pumas.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 36 queries.