*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 29, 2024, 07:38:27 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: .50 Cal Heavy Machinegun team  (Read 19613 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2011, 03:09:48 pm »

Oh yeah, OT, 50 cal team would be PHENOMENAL. Move slower (the gun itself is about 90 lbs, tripod is 35, ammo is fuckin heavy), double setup time, but more damage than the mounted 50, suppression less than the .30, but longer range than the MG42.

4-5 man team, something ilke 400MP/80 mun, 8 support pool.

i like that idea.

.50 cal hmg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M2_Browning
It's basically the same gun on the HT, sherman and m18

but since it will be on the ground, the accuracy will be better than on top of a vehicle.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2011, 03:33:36 pm »

thats why i said "basically" its called the m2hb and tahts the same name of the gun on the tank. so yeah. higher accuracy same stats sounds good tome
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2011, 04:00:03 pm »

i like that idea.

but since it will be on the ground, the accuracy will be better than on top of a vehicle.

Actually, the vehicle mount is just as stable as a tripod. On top of that, the use of a .50 over any range requires pre-sighted positions and settings.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2011, 04:03:45 pm »

STFU NOOBS GTFO REALISM


but .50 cal heavy machinegun plox!
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2011, 05:04:15 pm »

M1919A6 had a RoF of 500 RPM.

M2HB had a RoF of 550 RPM.

Faster RoF to the .50, pl0x.

I was going to suggest this in my PDF, do want. Add pl0x.
Logged

Quote from: tank130
I want to ensure we have a 100% decision on the process before we do the wipe.
If not, then I wipe, then someone gets something they shouldn't, then it gets abused, then the shit hits the fan and then I ban shab.

Getting EiR:R Released on Steam

Forum Rules & Guidelines
Mister Schmidt Offline
Lawmaker
*
Posts: 5006



« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2011, 05:05:02 pm »

Sorry Volsk but you asked for this.

Herp derp realism trololo
Logged

and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
Katusha Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 989



« Reply #26 on: August 26, 2011, 05:05:13 pm »

M1919A6 had a RoF of 500 RPM.

M2HB had a RoF of 550 RPM.

Faster RoF to the .50, pl0x.

I was going to suggest this in my PDF, do want. Add pl0x.

herp derp realism
Logged
spinn72 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802



« Reply #27 on: August 26, 2011, 05:07:50 pm »

herp derp realism

1 point for originality
/sarcasm
Logged
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #28 on: August 26, 2011, 05:08:02 pm »

Fair nuff, but everyone else that posted earlier stated that the .50 had a slower RoF--untrue to the max.
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #29 on: August 26, 2011, 05:12:14 pm »

Fair nuff, but everyone else that posted earlier stated that the .50 had a slower RoF--untrue to the max.

he does have a point
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #30 on: August 26, 2011, 05:19:13 pm »

so that would make it less accuraet right?
Logged
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #31 on: August 26, 2011, 05:21:33 pm »

M2HB could pull off well-aimed shots at almost a mile with a well-trained crew (on rare occasion). Not in the slightest, Tym.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #32 on: August 26, 2011, 05:36:37 pm »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI3DlIrvoHg

Start talking REAL CoH stats now plox.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #33 on: August 26, 2011, 05:42:03 pm »

Actually, the vehicle mount is just as stable as a tripod. On top of that, the use of a .50 over any range requires pre-sighted positions and settings.

Well I meant you know, firing on a moving platform haha.
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2011, 06:55:53 pm »

On top of that, the use of a .50 over any range requires pre-sighted positions and settings.

nothing requires pre-sighted positions and settings. it would render a weapon usless for anything other then defence as the slightest movement would make its settings invalid.

Plus the combination of tracer rounds, iron sites and being able to judge distance to any degree helps quite a bit.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #35 on: August 26, 2011, 07:20:48 pm »

nothing requires pre-sighted positions and settings. it would render a weapon usless for anything other then defence as the slightest movement would make its settings invalid.

Plus the combination of tracer rounds, iron sites and being able to judge distance to any degree helps quite a bit.

Not over any real distance. I have run a few .50 ranges. If you want to use its range for anything other than area suppression you need to have pre sighted settings. I'm not talking 500m, but 1000+. You know, where its actually better than something like an MG42or .30.

Yes you can fire by trying to aim it, but good luck using the shit iron sights. Better off just trying to walk it in.
Logged
Audemed Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 644



« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2011, 07:24:37 pm »

Eh, the iron sights aren't that bad. I could whack 800m targets with it in a single shot. With a T&E you can put every shot in the same spot at that range too.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2011, 07:36:34 pm »

Eh, the iron sights aren't that bad. I could whack 800m targets with it in a single shot. With a T&E you can put every shot in the same spot at that range too.

Wacking a target the size if a vehicle is very different than hitting a moving person that's trying not to get hit.
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2011, 11:56:16 pm »

Who, the, fuck, cares?

The thing is. It is a heavy machinegun. Fun for US Army. Fun unlock to suppress axis infantry. Has long range, has higher punch. Is slower to deploy and move. Has 4 men. Is cool. Those are the main points why.

Itd be cool Cheesy
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #39 on: August 27, 2011, 01:20:21 am »

Units should be added as needed. Not just to add units.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 36 queries.